Legal services, legal advice by California lawyers. The Law Offices of Christopher Brainard specialize in civil litigation, real estates disputes, business law,contracts, trusts and estate planning, judgment enforcement immigration visas

Home

Free Legal Advice

Legal Services

Experienced California Lawyer

Legal News

Legal Links

Bookmark Our Site

Home

Free Legal Advice

Legal Services

California Lawyer Our Legal Staff

Legal Disclaimer

Legal News

Legal Advice Links

California Lawyers Directory

ChristopherBrainard.com, legal services, legal advice by California attorneys, business lawyers Legal services, legal advice Civil litigation, business litigation, real estate litigation, entertainment, intellectual property, labor and employment law, bankruptcy, property law, and immigration visas.

legal services, legal advice in California by Christopher Brainard, California lawyer, business lawyer Legal services, legal advice Civil litigation, business litigation, real estate litigation, entertainment, intellectual property, labor and employment law, bankruptcy, property law, and immigration visas.

LEGAL ADVICE

TORTS AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY OUTLINE

Christopher Brainard

Evidence(Assume FRE)

Relevance(always)=

Logical Relevance=tendency to prove or disprove a material issue.

Rule Relates to event/person in controversy. Except: 1)Cause; 2)prior false claims/injury; 3)Intent/State of mind in issue; 4)Rebut; 5)Comparable Sales for value; 6)Industrial/Business Routine/Customs

Habit Evidence=to show acted in accordance w/habit= i)specific detailed conduct; ii)recurrence. 1)Disposed=No (careful/careless/No opinion/No reputation)). 2)No prior act Evid if person acted 2x. On MBE:  “invariably, automatically, always, instinctively.”

Discretionary Relevance=Probative value “substantially” outweighed by: 1)prejudice, 2)confuse issues, 3)mislead jury, 4)Undue delay/waste of time, 5)Cumulative.  Unfair surprise is not ground.

1)Liability Insurance=Prejudicial. Except:  1)Ownership/Control; 2)Bias/interest=impeach.

2)Subsequent Remedial Measure=Policy. Except: 1)Ownership/Control; 2)Rebut/Impeach=feasability. 

3)Settlements=Need Dispute=If parties say “your fault.” Compromise(w/admissions) not admissible

To pay meds, will sever!

Character Evidence as Substantive Evidence=Relevance

Circumstantial Evidence of Disposition to Infer Conduct:  Reputation/Opinion/Specific Acts.

Civil=NO. Except: Character In Issue=Reputation, Opinion, or Specific acts! *To relevant trait. Extrinsic.

Criminal=D may. Prosecutor rebuts. Reputation/Opinion! No specific acts.     *To relevant trait. Extrinsic.

        Prosecutor may rebut Reputation/Opinion D=Extrinsic. Inquire into any D’s bad acts=No Extrinsic!

D show V’s bad character=Same. Sex(Crime/Civil)=Dof V=NO; except injury/semen other/consent

Prosecutor show other sex crime?

Specific Acts if Independently Relevant (not as circumstantial evidence propensity):  403

Motive; Intent/Knowledge; Mistake; Identity; (Modus Operandi); Common Plan/Scheme. Opportunity. Purpose/Plan. Knowlege. 5 all 5 subject to 403 discretion prejudice.

        Habit Evidence(See above).

 

Real= 1)authenticate: Testimony/Unbroken chain of possession; 2)Same condition; 3)403 discretion.

Demonstrative/Photos=witness w/personal knowledge says is good representation.Exhibition of Child in Paternity Suits=allowed. Exhibition of Injuries=ok for damages if 403. Jury View of Scene=allowed.

Recordings/Computer Print outs/Measuring devices=foundation that good working order & accurate.

 

Documentary Evidence=Reliable:  HARBèRelevance, Authentication, Best Evidence, H/S

Authenticate=FoundationJudge decides if sufficient for jury finding of genuineness. Any sensible way

Admission; Eyewitness Testimony; Sign/Voice=Lay from before/after recognizes. Expert/Jury=compare. 

Reply Doctrine=written in response to communication in response to claimed author.

Ancient Docs=1)>20yrs; 2)Regular on face; 3)Found in place of regular custody.

Photos=just witness that says it is fair representation.  If no one=show operated correctly & from film.  X-rays etc=1)must show process is accurate, 2)machine operating correctly, 3)operator was qualified.

Self Authenticates=1)Certified public records, 2)Official publications, 3)News, 4)Trade marks, 5)Acknowledged docs{2xSigned}, 6)Commercial paper&related docs. CONTAC.

Best Evidence Rule=preference for original.

1)If prove content of Writing(recording/photo/x-ray)=i)writing legally dispositive; ii)witness knows from.

Except: 1)Independent Existence {Personally knows}, 2)Collateral issue, 3)Voluminous, 4)Public record.

2)Use Original/Duplicates=exact copy/photocopy(unless issue as to genuineness of original/unfair).

3)Unavailable= i)Lost/destruction; ii)outside Jx & unobtainable; iii)possession adversary who won’t give.

4)No degrees of secondary evidence=testimony or handwritten copies.

Parol Evidence Rule=no prior/contemporaneous if integrated.  Add=if not fully or normally & naturally not included.  Change=Can’t unless mistake in writing or not integrated.  Enforceability=allowed (condition precedent, mutual mistake).  Explain=ok.  Subsequent modification=ok.

 

Testimonial Evidence=

Reliable=1)personal knowledge; 2)oath of veracity. (Incompetent/Age/No religion belief=irrelevant Presumed capable:  rebut w/Extrinsic/Intrinsic then rebut rebuttal w/extrinsic/intrinsic.

Dead Man Stt=survivor(w/%) can’t testify against successors to deceased about com or pers trxns.

Form: Non leading unless Cross(scope of direct)or Efficiency(preliminary/loss of memory/hostile).

NOT Read TestimonyExcept:

Recollection Refreshed=1)Not remember, 2)any writing(unreliable), 3)Show opposing{may put in evid}.

Recollection Recorded=1)Not remember, 2)Personal know, 3)when mem fresh, 4)they/agent, 5)accurate. Read to jury, published if opposing counsel wants.  Its H/S but exception.

Lay Opinion:  admit: 1)personal knows; 2)Helpful to jury’s understanding; 3)not ultimate issue.

Expert Opinion=Ultimate issue Ok except as to D’s intent.

1)Appropriate subject matter{Judge by preponderance reliable b/c scientific methodology valid}; 

2)Qualified Expert{special training, skill, training}; 

3)Rsbl certainty/probability regarding opinion{not mere guesswork}; 

4)Based: i)personal observation, ii)facts{not admissible h/s}of type expert in field rsbly rely on.

Treatise: Impeach/Support Expert: 1)they’ve relied on it; 2)admission that its learned; 3)Get own expert to say it is; 4)Judicial NoticeIf get in this way then H/S exception. Does not physically go to jury.

 

Impeachment(yours or theirs) No bolstering=No prior consistent(H/S) unless prior ID(not H/S if witness).

1)Prior Inconsistent Statement=Not substantive evid, unless:  APO or 1)Oath; 2)formal{grand jury}; 3)not H/S! Extrinsic Evidence=opportunity to explain(unavailable?).

2)Bias/%/Motive/Reliability=Extrinsic after inquire. Arrest shows %-ie.deal w/prosec=Extrinsic arrest!

3)Prior Convictions of Witness=(No arrests): Crime of Dishonesty. Felony (<10yrs). Extrinsic.

4)Reputation for Untruth/Veracity=Extrinsic of reputation/opinion(only) for truth & veractiy.

5)Specific Acts of Deceit/Lying=Any act of dishonesty(good faith). *On Cross only(it’d be extrinsic)! NO Extrinsic!

No Extrinsic=1)Prior bad acts; 2)Collateral issue; 3)admits; 4)character W “heard dishonest or bad act.”

Rehabilitation=1)Explain;

2)No prior consistent=Only on cross.  Except: Id witness testifying (not witness=H/S); Impeached bias/fabricated testimony may rebut w/consistent statement prior to bias/fabrication

3)Reputation/Opinion=If prior impeached by conviction, lying, reputation.

 

 

H/S=“Out court statement to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” Inadmissible witness or writing.

B/c it denies opportunity to cross examine declarant (perception/memory really in issue).

Non H/S=Verbal Acts! Effect on Hearer/Reader; Circ Evidence of Declarant’s State of Mind{insanity}.

Prior Inconsistent Statement Under Oath & Formal Proceeding=Non H/S.

Prior Consistent Statement to Rebut charge of Recent Fabrication/Bias=Non H/S.

Prior ID by Witness Testifying=Non H/S.

APO=Non H/S.  Vicarious Admission: agent in scope of employ; partner; co-conspirator; director in corp.

 

Unavailbility=privilege; refuses; lack of memory; death/incapacity; absent.

1)Former Testimony=1)oath; 2)meaningful cross examination(similar %).

2)Statement Against Interest=1)pecuniary; 2)proprietary; 3)penal=at time statement was made.

3)Dying Declaration=1)Cause statement; 2)Belief dying(need facts); 3)Civil=yes; Criminal=homicide.

*Allowed to Impeach Out of Court Statement=no need to let confront or explain! Extrinsic if above!

 

Availability Irrelevant=Res Gestae

1)Excited Utterence=1)Startling event; 2)Made while under stress{some time lapse ok}; 3)Concern Facts.

2)Present Intent to do Something=to infer future act was done.

3)Present State of Mind=if in issue.  Malice/intent etc.

4)Present Sense Impression=precise & contemporaneous.

5)Present Physical Condition=

6)Past Physical Condition=1)to med personal; 2)for purpose of treatment. (Even if hired to testify).  Strike

7)Past Recollection Recorded=discussed above.

 

Business Records=1)made in course of business; 2)germane to business; 3)w/personal know of entrant; 4)entry made near time of event; 5)Authenticate(by testimony). For occurrence/nonoccurrence.

Hypo:  X saw & tells employees who put in record=2x H/S. Record Ok but employee’s of X Statement not.

Official Records=like business record(includes police reports+so entrant’s opinions ok, but other’s statements need exception!). Criminal case=Never admissible against D. Civil Cases=admissible.

 

Privileges=May not comment on it.  This is state law ergo Erie.

1)Attorney/Client=1)confidential communications; to 2)attorney/agent; 3)professional legal consultation, 4)privileged unless waived by client.  Corporate clients if know it is for legal & made for legal reasons.  Work product if necessity. 

2)No Privilege = 1)Future crimes or Frauds{attorney/client}; 2)Client puts in issue in case(malpractice); Between parties w/same lawyer; dispute between lawyer/physician/wife & client;  not privately made(post card).

3)Physician/Psychiatrist/Patient=confidential info for med in professional relationship entered into for purpose of obtaining treatment.  Does not apply if patient is litigant & health in issue.  Only applies in civil cases w/state Law!

4)Spousal Immunity=Don’t have(may) testify against spouse if married, Criminal.  Post/Pre-marriage etc.

   Confidential Marital Communication=Either prevent confidential confidences from marriage, civil/criminal.  Post/Pre-marriage allowed.

 

Judicial Notice=1)common knowledge in community or 2)capable of verification(must w/Stts, may of muni ords/foreign law).  Not Judges personal knowledge! Civil=conclusive;  Criminal=permissive.

 

Preliminary Fact Qs=Judge determines by preponderance of evidence admissibility Qs, may consider H/S, unauthenticated, anything=judges discretion if jury is present except confessions(out of presence of jury).  Jury determines weight & bound by rules.

 

Choice of Law=Diversity=Erie=Presumptions/Burdens of ProofCompetency of Witnesses(Dead Man Stts);  PrivilegesFed Q then look to Fed C/L.

More Outlines:

 

    Outlines  Legal Advice Civil Procedure  Legal Advice Contracts  Legal Advice Torts and Products Liability  Legal Advice Evidence  Legal Advice Remedies  Legal Advice Labor Law  Legal Advice Negotiations

                      Our Law offices accept credit cards, legal advice, legal consultation

CONTACT INFORMATION

OFFICE CONSULTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT ONLY:

Telephone:
     (310) 266 - 4115
Fax:
     (310) 878 - 0100
Address:

Law Offices of Christopher M. Brainard

468 North Camden Drive, 2nd Floor

Beverly Hills, California 90210

 
Electronic Mail:
information@christopherbrainard.com
 

IMPORTANT:  Nothing at this site should be construed as legal advise for any individual case or situation. This information is general content only, and should not be relied upon for any specific information. For specific legal advise consult an experienced attorney.

Top 100 Best Websites

 

 
 
Send mail to information@christopherbrainard.com with questions or comments about this web site. Copyright © 2004 Law Office of Christopher Brainard. All rights reserved.
 

 

Legal services and advice in French, by Christopehr Brainard, California lawyer, visas, immigration law, etc

 French Version

Legal services and advice in Spanish, by Christopher Brainard, California lawyers, visas, immigration law, business lawyers

Spanish Version

Immigration Case Status On Line

 

| Online Legal Advice | Legal services | Business Lawyers| California Lawyers | Immigration Lawyers Real estate Lawyers | Sitemap |

California Law Office of Christopher Brainard, CEO, All Rights Reserved.
No part of its material may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without written permission from Christopher Brainard Law Firm.

 

 

 

 

 

Sponsors:Designer handbags  | California Web Design | Past Life regression |